Pannunzio v. Monumental Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
The agent who solicited the insurance policy in issue was a long-time employee of the insurer. His duties were to sell insurance within the territory assigned to him, collect premiums and service debits and accounts. He described himself as “an insurance representative.”
At the trial, plaintiff, a filling station attendant, gave substantially the following account concerning the solicitation and delivery of the policy:
On August 8, 1955, the insurer’s agent came to plaintiff’s place of work and solicited first his employer and then him to purchase insurance. Plaintiff told the agent that he had…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Life & Casualty Ins. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Bible v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Continental Casualty Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Continental Life Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HowleOhio Supreme Court · 1903
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.