The Kawailani
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Hawaii.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
A motion is made in this cause ho dismiss the appeal. It is not contended that the appeal was not duly perfected, but that the record was not filed in' this court within the time prescribed by its rules. The appeal was perfected July 18, 1902, and the record was not filed here until January 5, 1903; but it was filed before any motion was made to dismiss, the latter not having been made until June 9, 1903. As said by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Altenberg et al. v. Grant et al., 83 Fed. 980, 981, 28 C. C. A. 244: “Bingham v. Morris, 7 Cranch, 99 [3…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Altenberg v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Bingham v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Republic of Hawaii v. AkoniHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henderson County, NC v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. KizerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- State v. SchutterHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Vogel v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- American Gas Machine Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.