People v. Olsowske
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during cross-examination of defendant and in summation. Because defendant objected to only one of the alleged instances of misconduct, he failed to preserve for our review his contention with respect to the remaining alleged instances (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Holden, 244 AD2d 961; People v Jacobs, 225 AD2d 1088, lv denied 88 NY2d 880). In any event, although the prosecutor should not have forced defendant on cross-examination to characterize the prosecution witnesses…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. HoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ThibodeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. LoMaglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. VitielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. BurnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- LOMAGLIO, MATTHEW L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.