People v. Holden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during cross-examination of defendant and in summation. Because defense counsel failed to object to any of the alleged misconduct, that contention has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311, 324; People v Broadus, 129 AD2d 997, lv denied 70 NY2d 643), and we decline to consider it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). In any event, although we do not condone the prosecutor’s conduct in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BroadusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. EldridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CasillasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. SwiatowyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. McClaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.