Legal Opinion
Chau Ngoc Nguyen v. Doak Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 4, 2007No. 57713-1-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
2Per curiam
Under certain circumstances, the seller’s failure to disclose concealed defects to the purchaser of residential property constitutes fraudulent concealment. But because appellants Naomi Nguyen and Sam Hong (collectively Hong) did not purchase their home from respondent Darryl Doak and Doak Homes, Inc. (collectively Doak), their claim for fraudulent concealment fails. Nor did Hong establish a material factual issue regarding alleged *729Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, violations. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Hong’s claims on summary judgment.
FACTS
¶2…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- White v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Bavand v. OneWest Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Carlile v. Harbour Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Carlile v. Harbour Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Alexander v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.