Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2005No. WD 64266PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

After a trial de novo, the Circuit Court of Linn County entered a judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue’s (“Director”) revocation of Harold Murphy’s (“Murphy”) driver’s license for excessive blood alcohol content. On appeal from that judgment, Murphy claims that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of toxicology test results based on the blood sample obtained from Murphy by the arresting officer after Murphy refused consent.

As set forth below, we hold that under the plain language of section 577.037, the results of the blood test taken by the arresting…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Cox v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Riley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. DowdyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Coble v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Covert v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Mullen v. Director of Missouri Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API