Legal Opinion

State v. Dowdy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2011No. SD 30381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

Neil Dowdy (“Defendant”) was charged with second-degree murder, armed criminal action, and unlawful use of a weapon for possessing a firearm while intoxicated. Defendant moved to suppress the results of a warrantless breath test of his blood alcohol content on the grounds that the search and seizure violated his federal and state constitutional rights.1 *869Following a hearing, the trial court granted Defendant’s motion and suppressed the evidence because:

Absent case authority from the U.S. Supreme Court or an appeals court in Missouri approving the taking of a blood…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  5. Blydenburg v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. State v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. DowdyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API