State v. Dowdy
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.
Neil Dowdy (“Defendant”) was charged with second-degree murder, armed criminal action, and unlawful use of a weapon for possessing a firearm while intoxicated. Defendant moved to suppress the results of a warrantless breath test of his blood alcohol content on the grounds that the search and seizure violated his federal and state constitutional rights.1 *869Following a hearing, the trial court granted Defendant’s motion and suppressed the evidence because:
Absent case authority from the U.S. Supreme Court or an appeals court in Missouri approving the taking of a blood…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Blydenburg v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. DowdyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011