Legal Opinion
Kuehl v. Cass County, Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 20, 1996No. 95-960PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
The plaintiffs in the district court, Dale E. Kuehl, Pam S. Kuehl, Clayton Hollman, and Jennifer Hollman (Kuehls and Hollmans), sought to establish that their proposed hog confinement facility in Cass County was exempt from county zoning regulations. The Cass County Board of Adjustment disagreed, as did the district court. The Kuehls and Hollmans urge on this appeal that these decisions represent an erroneous interpretation of Iowa Code section 335.2 (1995). The ap-pellees, who are the county board of adjustment, the county zoning administrator, the county board of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Helmke v. BD. OF ADJ., CITY OF RUTHVENSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Farmegg Products, Inc. v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Thompson v. Hancock CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CabanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Goodell v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Premium Standard Farms, Inc. v. Lincoln TownshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Office of Child Support Ex Rel. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Kramer v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.