Legal Opinion

Harris v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1994No. 92-05097PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

The taxpayer appeals from the Tax Court’s denial of his deduction of his distributive share of payments made by his partnership to a corporation as a research and development expense under 26 U.S.C. § 174(a)(1). Because we find the partnership did not pay for research and development “in connection with” its own trade or business, we affirm the Tax Court.

I

In 1981, Jake Bauer and Howard Leith carried out a plan to attract capital for continued funding of their research and development of cementitious composites for use as tooling in the aerospace industry and of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Snow v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Green v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants & Specialties, L.P. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Joseph P. Chamberlain and D. Kathleen Chamberlain v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Estate of Moore v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Brookes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  5. Clearmeadow Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API