Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Colon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1991Published

1DissentTitone, J.

Although defendant was charged with a single count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]), at his trial, the prosecution, over numerous objections, was permitted to elicit extensive testimony which ultimately linked defendant to a large scale drug selling enterprise. The introduction of this highly prejudicial evidence clearly acted to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233; People v Crandall, 67 NY2d 111; People v Molineux, 168 NY 264). The Appellate Division majority’s conclusion that this evidence was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API