Legal Opinion

Fox v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1967No. 9191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from an order granting summary judgment. '

*361The parties and this factual controversy were before the court in a prior appeal1 and the basic facts of the controversy are set out fully there and need not be reiterated here. The first case was an action brought to recover upon a fire insurance policy. Recovery in the district court was had there against the insurer and the adjustment company. We affirmed the judgment as against the insurer under the provisions of the insurance contract and reversed as to the adjustment company. Now appellants are seeking to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Maxine G. EverettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. Security Insurance Company of New Haven v. Virgil H. Johnson and Rex Bratcher, D/B/A Johnson-Bratcher Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Providential Development Company, a Corporation, and W. C. Jackson v. United States Steel Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. First National Bank in Wichita v. LutherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. Connecticut Fire Insurance Company v. A. H. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A. H. Fox v. Connecticut Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API