Legal Opinion

Wenzel v. Conrad Schmitt Studios

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

As appears more particularly from the foregoing statement of facts, suit was brought on a promissory note given to the grantor of land as part payment of the purchase price. The grantor indorsed the note to a bank for value before due. The bank sued the grantor and the maker and the accommodation indorsers to recover on the note. After judgment was ordered for recovery of the amount of the note, but before it was entered, a stipulation was signed by all the parties providing for a present payment and for payment of the balance in the future in instalments at specified times and for specified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. BudziszWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Matteson v. EllsworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Wisconsin Trust Co. v. CousinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bettack v. ConachenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kurz v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karzen v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API