Matthew Walter Stephan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge
Plaintiff, Matthew Stephan (“Stephan”), pro se, brings this action alleging that he is entitled to a Living Quarter Allowance (“LQA”), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 5923. The case is now before the Court on the United States’ (the “Government”) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Government questions whether the statute or its implementing regulations are money-mandating. The Court concludes that jurisdiction is proper, such that the Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.
I. Background
a. Legal Framework
The Overseas Differentials…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Urban v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014