Legal Opinion

Matthew Walter Stephan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 17, 2013No. 12-481CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge

Plaintiff, Matthew Stephan (“Stephan”), pro se, brings this action alleging that he is entitled to a Living Quarter Allowance (“LQA”), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 5923. The case is now before the Court on the United States’ (the “Government”) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Government questions whether the statute or its implementing regulations are money-mandating. The Court concludes that jurisdiction is proper, such that the Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

I. Background

a. Legal Framework

The Overseas Differentials…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Urban v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API