Legal Opinion
(PC) Rodriguez v. Cate
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 2, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00898Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERICK EDDIE RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00898-KES-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 M. CATE, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Erick Eddie Rodriguez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 On May 17, 2024, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 53.) The 21 motion included a Rand1 warning to Plaintiff. (Doc.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.