Legal Opinion

Kenwell v. Lee

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Appellate Division striking from the judgment entered on the remittitur paragraph numbered eighth is reversed and that paragraph is reinstated. It was pointed out in Kenwell v. Lee (261 N. Y. 113, 116) that there was a fundamental difficulty with the entire proceeding in that a water district was not a municipality within the meaning of section 7 of article VII of the Constitution. Every step taken for the establishment of the Inlet Water District from and including the original petition and map, contemplated the use of Bug lake as a reservoir. Since Bug lake and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flynn v. . HurdNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Kenwell v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Hara v. HarwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API