Legal Opinion
Newman v. Dinallo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 5, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In this proceeding, the appellants seek to compel the respondent, Eric R. Dinallo, Superintendent, Insurance Department of the State of New York, to disclose information pursuant to their *637“request for information” dated August 1, 2008, which consisted of 21 items, and which had been submitted to the respondent by-George Nager, the attorney who represented the petitioners in connection with an insurance matter. With three possible exceptions (items 2, 10, and 16), the 21 items set forth in Nager’s “request for information” did not demand production of any particular record, document, or any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Konigsberg v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- MATTER OF MARKOWITZ v. SerioNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Coalition of Landlords, Homeowners & Merchants, Inc. v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Roque v. Kings County District Attorney's OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Brown v. DiFioreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Rozz v. Nassau County Department of AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rozz v. Nassau County Department of AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Verizon New York Inc. v. New York State Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 2014