Legal Opinion

Central Bank of Rochester v. Gleason

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

This action is brought against the defendants upon a promissory note executed on the 3d day of November, 1921.

Defendant Kate Gleason answered and admitted that defendant Northway Trailer Car Company on said date made and delivered to the Rochester Forge, Inc., a promissory note, a copy of which *29is set forth in the complaint; that said note was duly presented for payment and payment demanded, and that no part thereof had been paid. Said defendant denied that she had any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to whether or not the Rochester Forge, Inc., before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . EagletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Dunbar Box & Lumber Co. v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Star Dairy, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. First State Bank of Denton v. Smoot-Curtis Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Starley v. Deseret Foods CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Touris v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API