Evans v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Worrill, Justice.
1. The trial court did not err, as complained of in the seventh and eighth special grounds of the amended motion for new trial, in permitting two named witnesses to testify in the trial of the case over objection of the defendants, even though their names did not appear on the indictment at the time the case was called for trial, and they did not testify before the grand jury and their names were not on demand furnished by the prosecuting attorney to the defendant. Code (Ann.) § 2-105; Taylor v. State, 138 Ga. 826 (5) (76 S. E. 347); Harris v. State, 190 Ga. 258 (2) (9 S. E.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Pulliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Post v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Holley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Britten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Britten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965