Legal Opinion
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Harris
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 30, 1972No. Civ-72-636PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHANDLER, District Judge.
The plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corporation, known as AMTRAK, seeks a judicial declaration that the provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution, Article 27, § 4 and of the Oklahoma Statute, Title 37 Okl.St.Ann. § 538(h), relating to the sale of alcoholic beverages are inapplicable to it; that the Congress of the United States has placed the regulation of its activities completely under the control of the Federal Government; that the enforcement of these provisions against it 1 interferes with the uniform interstate operation of AMTRAK and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association, Inc. v. The Public Service Commission Of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Chewie v. LockDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation, A/K/A Amtrak v. Curtis P. Harris, District Attorney, District No. 7, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, Charles J. Davis and Catherine L. Nuckolls, Intervening v. Weldon E. Davis, Director, Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Soonersphere Club Association, an Unincorporated Association, and Ruby Boyd v. Curtis P. Harris, District Attorney, Disrict No. 7, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, With Sooner Alcohol-Narcotics Education, Inc., a Corporation, and Ross J. McLennan Amicus-CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Schneider v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Schneider v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978