Legal Opinion

McMeen v. Whipple

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1961No. 36501PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

This is an equitable action based upon fraud in the exchange of real estate. The defendants appeal from a decree finding fraud and directing a cancellation of deeds. A freehold is involved.

Defendant Walter E. Whipple, on Sunday, November 24, 1957, initiated negotiations with Marie Pohren for an exchange of a Fulton County farm in the name of his wife Florence, for a residence in the village of Wyanet. (While legal title to the residence was vested in plaintiffs Dolores V. McMeen and her husband Bruce as joint tenants, Marie, mother of Dolores, had an equitable interest in the property.)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. LandfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Dillman v. NadlehofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Schwabacker v. RiddleIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Miller v. JohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Johnston v. ShockeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gerill Corp. v. Jack L. Hargrove Builders, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Crowder v. Bob Oberling Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Hurley v. Frontier Ford Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Pohren v. PohrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. P.M.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. North (In Re North)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API