Legal Opinion
State v. Ulmer
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 2013No. 2012-KA-0949PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge.
_JjThe sole issue in this criminal appeal is whether the district court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence. Finding no error, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On May 24, 2010, the State filed a bill of information charging the defendant, Gregory Ulmer, with possession of cocaine, a violation of La. R.S. 40:967(0(2). On May 27, 2010, he pleaded not guilty. On August 17, 2010, a motions hearing was held. The district court found probable cause and denied Mr. Ulmer’s motion to suppress the evidence. Finding…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State ex rel. J.W.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State of Louisiana v. Corey StevensonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Corey StevensonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.