Legal Opinion

Grumbling v. Motter

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County

Decided December 18, 1950No. 602Published

1Opinion of the Court

Griffith, J.,

Defendant filed a preliminary objection asking that the complaint be stricken off because of a lack of conformity to law under Pa. R. C. P. 1017(6) (2).

Plaintiff brought suit in trespass before an aider-man, which resulted in a judgment being entered for plaintiff and against defendant in the sum of $80.65. Defendant appealed from the alderman’s judgment to this court, whereupon plaintiff filed a complaint in assumpsit claiming the same amount.

Plaintiff sets forth facts sufficient to sustain an action of trespass, and avers that plaintiff’s automobile while lawfully parked and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Cox v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Kraft v. GilchristSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  4. Reitze v. Meadville & L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API