Legal Opinion

In the Matter of a Charge of Judicial Misconduct or Disability

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 18, 1996No. Judicial Council Complaint 95-14PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

By Order filed November 27, 1995, Chief Judge Edwards dismissed “for failure to allege conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts,” the complaint filed herein against a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Thereafter, complainant filed a petition addressed to the Judicial Council seeking review of the Order of dismissal. Upon consideration thereof, it is

ORDERED, by the Judicial Council, that the Chief Judge’s Order be affirmed, and the petition for review be denied, for the reasons stated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In Re Marion S. BarryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  3. In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  2. In re Charge of Judicial Misconduct or DisabilityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  3. In the Matter of a Charge of Judicial Misconduct or DisabilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. In the Matter of a Charge of Judicial Misconduct or DisabilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  5. In the Matter of a Charge of Judicial Misconduct or Disability. Judicial Council Complaint No. 99-1. Judicial Council of the District of Columbia CircuitCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API