Legal Opinion

Morris v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided June 6, 1997No. 97-141PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FARLEY, Judge.

In the appellant’s motion for panel review pursuant to Rule 35 of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, he has alleged that this judge is “clearly biased toward [his] case” and “prejudiced toward [him].” Construing these statements as a motion for my recusal, that motion will be denied for the reasons stated below.1

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 24, 1997, the appellant filed a Notice of Appeal (NOA) from the January 14, 1997, decision of the Chairman of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) denying reconsideration of a May 6, 1991, BVA…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
In the Matter of Bradford MasonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
George C. Hook v. The Honorable Joe Billy McDade Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
Bernice ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Morris v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
11-22 176Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2018