Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clackamas County v. Dunham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 1977No. 91323, CA 6817Published

1DissentSchwab, C. J.

We have had a series of cases, all from Clackamas County, in which the same attorney, apparently in part representing a mobile home trade association, has *603repeatedly presented "Brandéis briefs” about the wisdom and desirability of allowing mobile homes. Were I a state or local legislator, I would find many of these arguments cogent. However, until today these arguments were not deemed judicially cognizable by a single judge. Today the perseverance of repeatedly praising the virtues of mobile homes produces a majority opinion holding that mobile homes are an outright permitted use in all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API