Legal Opinion
Sippell v. Dowd
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHagerty, J.
This application under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act was made by ten named petitioners, competitive civil service employees of the City of Buffalo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (an estimated 400 to 500). They seek an order directing the Mayor, the common council and the civil service commission of the city of Buffalo *560to take appropriate action to restore to.them alleged vested rights in regard to promotion and seniority of which, the petitioners claim, they were deprived by action of the respondents.
From the petition, the answer,’ the reply of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Kornbluth v. ReavyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Buckley v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Brandt v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Matter of O'Callaghan v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mandle v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Gates v. WalkleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Sippel v. DowdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Ficken v. Vocational Education & Extension Board of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Naftal Associates v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.