Legal Opinion

Arway v. Redding Zoning Commission, No. 31 22 34 (Mar. 10, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 10, 1993No. 31 22 34Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS The defendant, Redding Zoning Commission, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal under section 8-8(j) of the General Statutes on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to take the appeal within fifteen days from the date that a notice of the Commission's decision was published, as required by section 8-8(b). The plaintiff counters that the legal notice was deficient because it failed to give notice that a special permit was approved as well as a site plan, and that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  2. Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Akin v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Hyatt v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Valley Cable Vision, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API