Legal Opinion

People v. Atou

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 2007No. 1-05-3741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly determined there was a conflict between local circuit court rule 14.2 and section 103—5(b) of the Illinois Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (commonly referred to as the Speedy Trial Act) (725 ILCS 5/103—5(b) (West 1998)), where the local rule requires a defendant to serve the State’s Attorney with a speedy-trial demand in open court but the statutory provision does not contain an open-court requirement.

Cook County circuit court rule 14.2 provides that “[ajny demand for trial made in felony or misdemeanor cases by a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BywaterIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. LendabarkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. People v. CampaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. People v. WatkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. DurhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. People v. OwensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  3. Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. People v. SandovalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. SandovalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API