Legal Opinion

General Mills Federal Credit Union v. Lofgren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 2013No. A13-0781PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

In this interpleader action to determine the beneficiary of an IRA, appellant, who asserts that he is the intended beneficiary, *768challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent, the named beneficiary. Appellant argues that the district court erred by failing to consider evidence of (1) the intent of decedent IRA owner to change the IRA beneficiary and (2) decedent’s reasonable belief that she had, in fact, effectively changed the IRA beneficiary before her death.

The district court declined to consider any evidence of decedent’s intent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Brown v. AginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Lemke v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NORRIS v. POOLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  2. Jeffrey S. Bittner v. U.S. Bank National AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2023
  3. NORRIS v. POOLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  4. NORRIS v. POOLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API