Legal Opinion
Exxon Corp. v. Hunt
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided April 23, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVERS, J. T. C.
The. issue presented on cross-motions for summary judgment involves the constitutionality of the New Jersey Spill Compensation And Control (spill fund) Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11 et seq. Its resolution requires a determination of whether that statute has been preempted by § 114(c)1 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability (super fund) *299Act of 1980, P. L. 96-510, 94 Stat. 2767, codified as 42 U.S.C.A. § 9601 et seq., in which event it must fall, as mandated by the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.2 For the reasons hereafter set…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Exxon Corp. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Armstrong v. Taxation Division DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Exxon Corp. v. HuntNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Exxon Corp. v. HuntNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.