Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Carminati, William McKenney Jr., and Michael Galgano

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 25, 1957No. 24570_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants were convicted upon an indictment charging them with a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 to receive, possess, and sell heroin in violation of the federal narcotics laws. 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 173, 174; 26 U.S.C. §§ 4701, 4703, 4704(a), 4724(c), 4771(a). Each appellant contends that the evidence as to him was insufficient to prove his participation in the conspiracy and each assigns as error certain rulings made by the trial court as to the admissibility of evidence. In addition to these contentions appellants Carminati and McKenney also contend the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. VarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Consolidated Laundries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. StrombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API