Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosenthal v. First National Bank of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 9, 1967No. Gen. 51,049Published

1DissentMcCORMICK, J.

I must respectfully dissent to a part of the majority opinion. We agree that the only trust involved is the Philip Trust, as the res of the Marie-Louise Trust was transferred to her prior to the death of either Carolyn or Philip, under the provisions of paragraph 7 of the will of Moise Dreyfus; consequently, in this dissent I will refer only to the Philip Trust.

In considering the dispositive scheme of the testator the entire will must be read as a whole. In Weber v. Hawkins, 30 Ill2d 278, 196 NE2d 695, the court said, at page 283:

“In construing a will the court’s primary mandate is to give…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Low v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Levings v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Stern v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Allen v. Nat. Bank of AustinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  5. Thompson v. J. D. Thompson Carnation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API