Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Kingston

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1949No. 10769PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, circuit judge.

The National Labor Relations Board, petitioner herein, in accordance with the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947,* after proceedings on a charge against respondent, Kingston, that he was engaged in unfair labor practices, found that he was engaged in such practices within the meaning of Section 8(a) (1) and Section 7 of the Act.

Section 8(a) of the Act provides:

“Sec. 8. (a) It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer—
“(1) to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Penokee Veneer Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Bradley Washfountain Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. Cone Brothers Contracting Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Charles R. Krimm Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Protein Blenders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  5. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API