Legal Opinion
Al-Saedi v. Nepal
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1113Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOHAMMED MAHMOD ALI AL-SAEDI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-cv-1113 (RDM) ROHIT NEPAL, Chargé d’Affaires, a.i., U.S. Embassy in Jordan, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Mohammed Mahmod Ali Al-Saedi, a citizen of the United Kingdom, brings this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(1), and the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, against Defendants Rohit Nepal, Chargé d’Affaires at the U.S. Embassy in Jordan, and Marco Rubio, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of State. Dkt. 1 at 7 (Compl. ¶¶…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.