Legal Opinion

In re Mary R. Latimer Trust

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 2, 2013No. C.M. No. 17254-N-VCLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LASTER, V.C.

The Wilmington and Brandywine Cemetery (the “Cemetery”) and PNC Bank, N.A. (the “Trustee”) petitioned to modify a trust established for the maintenance of two burial lots (the “Trust”). Contending that the Trust has a charitable purpose, they relied on the common law doctrine of cy pres, Delaware’s statutory codification of the cy pres doctrine, and the common law doctrine of deviation. The petition is denied.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Mary R. Latimer (the “Settlor”) established the Trust pursuant to an agreement dated December 3, 1924, among the Set-tlor and the predecessors to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Tax CommissionerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bank of Delaware v. BucksonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
  3. Delaware Trust Co. v. GrahamCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  4. Anderson v. Mount Zion Cemetery Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  5. In Re Estate of Du PontCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas W. du Pont v. Wilmington Trust CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
  2. Douglas W. du Pont v. Wilmington Trust CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API