Larkins v. Routson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This controversy centers about the construction to be given the words “their legal representatives,” as used in Section 8577, General Code. It is conceded that the undivided one-half of this 80 acres came to Sorena Larkins by descent from his father, John Larkins, and passes, by Section 8573, to the heirs at law of his father, John Larkins, being the ancestor from Avhom the estate came. The title to the remaining undivided 40 acres, being a title by purchase, upon the death of Sorena Larkins passed to his widow, Mary Ellen Harkness Larkins. She died intestate, without children, and having…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Center v. KramerOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Pepper Pike v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Miller v. ShepardOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
- Russell v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Gruhler v. HossafausMontgomery County Probate Court · 1963
- Billman v. BillmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.