Legal Opinion

Center v. Kramer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925No. 18782PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The sole question to be determined in this controversy is whether the personal property of the intestate, John Holstein, passes to the plaintiffs in error, the children by another marriage of Holstein’s wife, who predeceased him, or whether the said personal property passes to and is vested in the state. It is conceded that plaintiffs in error are not entitled to the property nnder the provisions of Section 8578, General Code, as they do not fall within the classes enumerated within Section 8574, to which Section 8578 refers, and that there is no person entitled to inherit the property nnder…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berry v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Cummings v. CummingsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Larkins v. RoutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Borovskaya v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Leary v. ScullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API