Legal Opinion

Nathan Thomas v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1963No. 8650_1PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.

A state prisoner here seeks release on habeas corpus, claiming that he was placed on trial in the Virginia courts despite an uncontroverted showing that he was insane. The District Court dismissed the petition without a hearing but granted a certificate of probable cause for this appeal, “being of the opinion that a substantial question with regard to the allegations of insanity is presented.”

Nathan Thomas alleged that he was indicted in Buchanan County, Virginia, In 1955 on five unrelated charges of grand larceny and one charge of removing stolen property into the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat County, State of Washington, and James StarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Charles Blair v. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Patton v. State of North CarolinaDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1966

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API