Legal Opinion
United States v. Falcon
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided January 9, 2008No. 07-0105/NAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge ERDMANN
delivered the opinion of the court.
Postal Clerk Seaman Esteban Falcon entered guilty pleas and was convicted of two specifications of opening and stealing mail, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000), and three specifications of making and uttering cheeks without sufficient funds, in violation of Article 123a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 923a (2000). On appeal to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, Falcon argued that the military judge erred in accepting his guilty pleas to the bad check offenses without first…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262 v. GazzamSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AllberyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. BlanksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. KaneUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. WittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.