Legal Opinion

City of Crossett v. Pacific Buildings, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 1, 1989No. 88-286PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This is an appeal from the chancellor’s ruling ordering the City of Crossett to accept, maintain and operate the sewer system installed in the Woodlawn Subdivision. The city appeals, alleging seven points of error. We find no error and therefore affirm.

The Woodlawn Subdivision was the product of a joint venture between Southeast Properties and Real Estate and Pacific Buildings, Incorporated. These two companies used the name Woodlawn Development Company (Woodlawn) for their joint venture.1 Woodlawn employed the engineering firm of Marion Crist and Associates, which assisted…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Blaylock v. StreckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Parker v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Smith v. McKeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Jr. Food Mart of Arkansas, Inc. v. T.A. Bone, Inc. (In re Jr. Food Mart of Arkansas, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API