Legal Opinion

Tamarah Caudill v. Lemberg Group Inc. and Kim Konstantin

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided April 16, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00806Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO TAMARAH CAUDILL, Plaintiff, v. No. 24-cv-939-WJ-KK LEMBERG GROUP INC., and KIM KONSTANTIN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Tamarah Caudill’s Motion for Remand (Doc. 23) (the Motion) and Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate this case with related case number 1:25-cv-00806-GJF-SCY. (Doc. 62). The Court first resolves the Motion for Remand before turning to the Motion to Consolidate. MOTION…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API