Legal Opinion
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports
Decided January 8, 1976Published
1Opinion of the Court
QUESTION: Are employees of the Department of Offender Rehabilitation who are designated law enforcement officers pursuant to s. 790.001(8)(d), F. S., law enforcement officers within the meaning and intent of s. 90.141, F. S.?
SUMMARY: Employees of the Department of Offender Rehabilitation who have been designated as "law enforcement officers" by the head of the department and are actually serving as armed guards or custodial officers or employees with custody and control of prisoners in any of our correctional institutions are entitled to the per diem, travel expenses, and witness fees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Priest v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Kimball v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- State v. GrantNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Frazier v. ElmoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.