Legal Opinion

City of Burien v. Kiga

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2001No. 70830-4PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

— This case concerns the constitutionality of Initiative 722 (1-722). We hold 1-722 violates the single subject clause of Wash. Const, art. II, § 19 and, therefore, must be voided in its entirety. We affirm the Thurston County Superior Court.

FACTS

I-722 was presented to the people of Washington State on November 7, 2000, under the following ballot title:

Shall certain 1999 tax and fee increases be nullified, vehicles exempted from property taxes, and property tax increases (except new construction) limited to 2% annually?

*823Clerk’s Papers at 25.1-722 purported to grant tax relief by nullifying…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Brower v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Power, Inc. v. HuntleyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Heavey v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. WASH. ASS'N FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Pierce County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Washington Ass'n of Neighborhood Stores v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API