Centillion Data Systems, Inc. v. Ameritech Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
Denying Bell Sygma’s motion for discovery of settlement agreement (doc. no. 95), and Granting Intervenor AT & T’s motion for protective order (doc. no. 115), as modified.
FOSTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This cause came before the Court on the above entitled motions. In its motion, defendant Bell Sygma sought discovery of the settlement agreement between plaintiff Centillion Data Systems and AT & T Corp. which resolved an earlier suit in this Court involving the same patents at issue in this cause. Plaintiff Centillion did not object to Bell Sygma’s request, but raised the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Bottaro v. Hatton AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Knoll v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Shipes v. BIC Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1994
- Doe v. Methacton School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sheppard v. River Valley Fitness One, L.P.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Alford v. PressleyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.