Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1972No. 27564PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

This is an appeal after a conviction of rape. A motion for new trial, as well as a motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto was filed in the trial court. The motion for new trial as amended was overruled by the trial court, and according to the amended notice of appeal the defendant expressly abandoned the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto in open court. Held: "

1. During the closing argument a motion for mistrial was made on the ground that the district attorney commented on the failure of the defendant to make a statement. The exact language is not shown by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. Spell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Coker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Herrmann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API