Legal Opinion

Mardis v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1994No. 1921935PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Wayne and Jacqueline Mardis, appeal from a summary judgment for the defendant, Ford Motor Credit Company ("FMCC"), the assignee of a consumer credit contract signed by the Mardises when they purchased an automobile from Cloverleaf Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. ("Cloverleaf'). We affirm.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Mardises, indicates that the Mardises purchased a used 1985 automobile from Cloverleaf based on representations from a salesman that the automobile was a 1986 model. The Mardises did not discover until approximately a year and a half later that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bean v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Wood v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Guess v. SnyderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Butler v. Aetna Finance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Kimbrel v. Mercedes-Benz Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. William Castleberry v. Goldome Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Ex Parte Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Luck v. PRIMUS AUTO. FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
  5. Dickinson v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API