Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Daniel Feder & Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

TError to Circuit Court, Kanawha County. Action of unlawful detainer by M. B. Goldman against Daniel Feder & Co. Judgment for defendant in justice’s court, judgment for plaintiff on appeal to the intermediate 'court, writ of error to such judgment refused by the circuit 'court and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger, Judge:. The judgment now under review is one for the plaintiff in an action of unlawful detainer, commenced in a justice’s - . *601court, in which the defendant prevailed. On an appeal in the Intermediate Court of Kanawha County, the plaintiff prevailed, and the Circuit Court of said County refused a writ of error to the judgment.

The plaintiff having acquired the title to the premises in question, within the term prescribed by a lease thereof executed by his grantor, two years, commencing March 1, 1917, and while the lessee was in possession, on or about May 1, 1917, proceeds upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SettegastTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kanawha-Gauley Coal & Coke Co. v. SharpWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Austin v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1858
  4. Shattuck v. LovejoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1857

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cities Service Oil Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Investors' Guaranty Corp. v. ThomsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Butler v. CarlyleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. HinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API