Legal Opinion

Pelton Water Wheel Co. v. Doble

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1911No. 1,970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. Suit in equity by May E. Doble against the Pelton Water Wheel Company. Decree for complainant (186 Eed. 526), and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

[1] This appeal brings under review the interlocutory decree of the Circuit Court granting a perpetual injunction against the further infringement of the eight claims of reissue letters patent No. 12,460, granted on February 27, 1906, to William A. Doble for an improvement in “nozzles for impact water wheels.” The suit was brought by the appellee as owner of the patent against the appellant as the infringer thereof. Infringement is not denied. The defenses of the appellant in the court below and here are want of' invention. anticipation, and that the patent covers a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. New York Scaffolding Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. Independent Oil Well Cementing Co. v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Sodemann Heat & Power Co. v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  5. Hughes Tool Co. v. International Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API