Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Aldridge v. Lamont

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 30, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00924Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KIMBERLY ALDRIDGE, No: 3:20-cv-00924 (KAD) Plaintiff, v. NED LAMONT, December 30, 2020 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF NOS. 15, 22) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Kimberly Aldridge (“Aldridge” or the “Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Governor Ned Lamont (“Governor Lamont” or the “Governor”) alleging that Executive Orders 7G, 7X, and 7DDD, issued by the Governor to address the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API