Legal Opinion

Hilford v. Hilford

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorris Sliekin, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike defendant’s affirmative defense or in the alternative, to strike defendant’s demand for a jury trial and further, to frame issues to be determined by the jury. The motion is disposed of as hereinafter set forth.

Plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon claimed cruel and inhuman treatment by defendant for which she seeks a decree of divorce. Further, plaintiff seeks a judgment against defendant to reimburse plaintiff for moneys claimed to have been expended by her for necessaries.

Defendant’s answer serves a general denial and, as an affirmative defense only, alleges…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woicik v. WoicikNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ray v. RayNew York Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Biamonte v. BiamonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API